Do You Need to Worry About BPA in Plastic Bottles?

A recent study released by the Journal of theAll this flies in the face of 40 years of science,
American Medical Association raises a concernaccording to a statement released by the
about the chemical bisphenol-A, (BPA) in plasticAmerican Chemistry Council a few days after the
bottles, metal cans and various food packaging, asToday segment aired. Another thoughtful piece
well as in all those eco-friendly reusable waterby Gilbert Ross, M.D. of the American Council On
bottles we're all carrying around.Science And Health (who also appeared, very
Based on a health survey, the study found thatbriefly in the report) came out and called the
those who had higher amounts of BPA in theirToday report what it is - junk science.
urine were more likely to report having heartNot only that, the in-studio guest, Dr. Leo
disease and diabetes. Of course the researchTrasande of Mount Sinai Medical Center was given
presents no information that says the BPAample time during the six minute long segment to
caused these conditions, and the study authorsconvey his message, while Dr. Ross had only 6
agree that you can't rule out the possibility thatseconds to tell viewers that, "The toxic effects
people who already have heart disease orfound on rats were done at thousands of times
diabetes are more vulnerable to having BPA showhigher than we are exposed to in the
up in their samples.environment."
True to form, NBC's Today Show aired a reportNot so "fair and balanced" now is it?
earlier this year that glossed over the facts andThe media mis-information comes as the result of
highlighted a fearful danger - needlessly worryinga report by the National Toxicology Program that
millions of us who've fed our children from clearwas a follow up from an expert panel review
plastic baby bottles and sippy cups, who've triedcompleted in 2007. Both the expert panel and the
not to add to the world's pollution by switching toNTP reports similarly concluded a low-rate risk, or
re-useable water bottles.negligible concern, for adults and some concern
The story had us turning over our plasticfor infants and children.
containers in search of numbers (resin ID codes"That is the third-lowest ranking on NTP's
#3, #6 and #7) that it turns out, don't havefive-level scale. Yet the media has
anything to do with a product being made frommischaracterized the conclusions as suggesting a
BPA, the chemical bad guy of the piece.new direction is being given by NTP about the use
The "Consumer Alert" (inaccurately) said:of BPA. This is inaccurate," says Sharon Kneiss,
- There is no safe level of BPA, when in fact thevice president of the products division of the
chemical has been studied for many years andAmerican Chemistry Council (ACC).
found to be safe, especially considering that theUntil the science is sorted out, there is no way to
levels we ingest are thousands of times lowertell if a bottle you're using is made with BPA. If
than the rats that have been studied.you're especially concerned, you might want to
- Plastics containing BPA aren't safe in theavoid warming or microwaving food or beverages
microwave, yet a Dutch study that focused onin plastic containers until more research on the
BPA migration after microwaving found noleaking of the chemical can be completed.
evidence of any such thing.In the meantime the FDA is having a second
- Codes on the bottom of a container can tell youscientific panel give an opinion on the safety of
if it's safe. Wrong! These resin ID codes areBPA in plastic bottles and other packaging, though
intended to aid in recycling facilities, and havethe agency has confidence in its own research,
nothing to do with identifying bottles that havemore carefully designed and thorough than the
BPA. Any item intended to be used for foodhuman studies that seem to be causing all the
must pass tough FDA guidelines before its everconcern.
allowed on the market.